• Want to consult a lawyer in the Yaizu, Yoshida, Makinohara, Fujieda, or Omaezaki area
• Was pulled over by the police for having one brake light out
• Want to know if I have to pay a fine when the light was working during the morning inspection
• Cannot accept the blue ticket for vehicle maintenance deficiency
• Unsure whether to pay the traffic fine or contest it

Are you troubled by issues like these in Yaizu, Makinohara, Omaezaki, Fujieda, Shimada, Yoshida Town, or surrounding areas?
Yaizu Sogo Law Office offers a free initial legal consultation regarding traffic accident concerns. There is no obligation to retain our services after the initial consultation. We are also available on weekday evenings and Saturdays. Please feel free to contact us by phone or email.

A Burned-Out Brake Light Can Constitute a Traffic Violation

While driving a car, a police officer may stop you and say:

• "One of your brake lights is out."
• "Your vehicle has a maintenance deficiency."

and request that you pull over.

Brake lights are particularly difficult to check while you are driving.

For this reason,

• "It was working when I checked this morning."
• "It suddenly burned out while I was driving, so it could not be helped."
• "It is only one side, so it should not be a big deal."

Some people may feel this way.

However, brake lights are an important device that signals deceleration and stopping to the vehicle behind you.

Even if only one side is out, driving in that condition may cause the following vehicle to react late, potentially leading to rear-end collisions and other dangers.

Therefore, driving with a burned-out brake light may be treated as a "vehicle maintenance deficiency" under the Road Traffic Act.

Driving a Vehicle with Maintenance Deficiencies Is Prohibited

Article 62 of the Road Traffic Act prohibits driving a vehicle that does not comply with safety standards and may pose a danger to traffic or cause inconvenience to others.

Brake lights, tail lights, turn signals, and headlights are all important devices related to safe driving.

Driving on public roads with these devices not functioning properly may result in being cited for a vehicle maintenance deficiency.

In the case of brake lights, they serve the role of communicating to the following vehicle: "I am now decelerating" or "I am stopping."

Therefore, even during the daytime and even if only one side is out, a non-functioning light may be judged as a safety concern.

Can It Still Be a Violation Even If "It Was Working This Morning"?

In a case like this one, where:

• "The brake light was working during the morning inspection,"
• "It suddenly burned out while driving,"

the driver may understandably find it difficult to accept.

Indeed, if the light was functioning normally at departure and suddenly burned out during driving, it may be difficult for the driver to have known about the malfunction in advance.

However, if the brake light was out at the time the police officer requested the stop, the vehicle was, in appearance, being driven in a state of maintenance deficiency.

Therefore, the police officer may issue a traffic violation ticket, commonly known as a "blue ticket," for vehicle maintenance deficiency.

That said, depending on the specific circumstances—such as having inspected the vehicle that morning, being on the way to a repair shop immediately after noticing the malfunction, or being unable to detect the malfunction until pointed out by the police officer—there may be cases where only a warning is given, or where there is room to contest the violation.

In other words, it cannot be said that "you absolutely do not have to pay the fine just because the light was working this morning."

On the other hand, it also cannot be definitively said that "even if the light suddenly burned out while driving, the violation cannot be contested under any circumstances."

It is necessary to assess the situation based on the specific circumstances.

Traffic Fine and Penalty Points for Vehicle Maintenance Deficiency (Tail Lights, etc.)

In practice, a burned-out brake light may be treated as "vehicle maintenance deficiency (tail lights, etc.)."

For a standard passenger vehicle, the penalties for vehicle maintenance deficiency (tail lights, etc.) are generally:

Penalty points	1 point
Traffic fine	7,000 yen

as is generally the case.

The fine amounts differ for large vehicles, motorcycles, mopeds, and other vehicle types.

Note that penalty points are points under the administrative penalty system, while the traffic fine is a system for simplified processing of criminal procedures.

If the traffic fine is paid, the matter will not proceed to a criminal trial for that offense.

On the other hand, if the traffic fine is not paid, the case may proceed to regular criminal proceedings.

A Traffic Fine Is Different from a "Criminal Fine"

A common misconception regarding traffic violations is the difference between a "traffic fine" (hansokukin) and a "criminal fine" (bakkin).

A traffic fine is money paid under the Traffic Infraction Notification System.

For relatively minor traffic violations, if the traffic fine is paid within a specified period, the matter is concluded without proceeding to a criminal trial.

In contrast, a criminal fine is a criminal penalty.

It is a punishment imposed through court proceedings and may also involve the issue of a criminal record.

Therefore, paying a traffic fine under a blue ticket and being fined through criminal proceedings have different implications.

In traffic violation situations, it is easy to become confused even after receiving an explanation from a police officer. It is important to confirm whether the document you received is a blue ticket or a red ticket, and whether the amount is a traffic fine or a criminal fine.

Payment of the Traffic Fine Is Voluntary, but It Should Not Be Ignored

Payment of the traffic fine is, under the system, voluntary.

In other words, failure to pay the traffic fine does not immediately result in compulsory collection.

However, it is dangerous to simply think, "It is voluntary, so I do not have to pay."

If the traffic fine is not paid, after procedures including appearing at the Traffic Infraction Notification Center and going through the notification process, the case may ultimately proceed to criminal proceedings.

In that case, issues such as interrogation, summons from the public prosecutor's office, summary proceedings, and formal trials may arise.

If you do not dispute the facts of the violation and wish to conclude the matter quickly, paying the traffic fine is one option.

On the other hand, if you are not satisfied with the facts of the violation or have doubts about the police officer's determination, it is also possible under the system to contest by not paying the traffic fine.

However, contesting the violation involves time and emotional burdens.

Additionally, if the violation is ultimately upheld, issues of criminal and administrative penalties may remain.

Therefore, whether to pay the traffic fine or contest it requires careful judgment based on the details of the case, the evidence, the impact of penalty points, and the procedural burden going forward.

Possibility of Contesting When the Light Suddenly Burned Out While Driving

When a brake light suddenly burns out while driving, the issue that may become a point of contention is:

This is the key question.

For example, if the following circumstances exist, there may be room to consider contesting the violation:

• The brake light was actually checked before departure
• Both left and right lights were functioning normally at the time of inspection
• The vehicle had recently undergone a vehicle inspection or periodic maintenance
• The driver was unable to detect the malfunction until pointed out by the police officer
• The driver was heading to a repair shop immediately after noticing the malfunction
• There was no indication that the issue had been left unattended for a long period
• No other lights or devices had any problems

Conversely, if the following circumstances exist, it becomes more likely that the violation will be upheld:

• The driver had been aware of the burned-out bulb for some time
• Family members or acquaintances had pointed it out, but it was left unrepaired
• The vehicle had not been inspected for a long time
• The driver had been driving with the maintenance deficiency for several days
• The driver continued to drive without repairing the issue after receiving a warning from a police officer

In other words, simply claiming "it burned out while driving" may not be sufficient.

What matters is whether you can explain that you actually performed an inspection and the circumstances under which you were unable to detect the malfunction.

How to Respond When Stopped by a Police Officer

If you are stopped by a police officer for a burned-out brake light, it is not advisable to argue emotionally.

First, stay calm and assess the situation.

Specifically, confirm the following:

• Which light is out
• Whether it is one side or both sides
• Whether it is the brake light, tail light, or license plate light
• What violation name the police officer intends to use for processing
• Whether a blue ticket will be issued or only a warning will be given

Check these points.

If you had inspected the vehicle before departure, it is important to calmly explain:

• "I confirmed the lights were working before departure."
• "It appears the light burned out while driving."
• "I will have it repaired immediately."

Explaining this calmly is important.

If on-the-spot repair is not possible, it may also be appropriate to inform the officer that you will head to the nearest repair shop or auto parts store.

However, if the police officer asks you to sign the blue ticket, you need to carefully consider whether to sign.

Signing is generally related to confirming the facts of the violation, so if you are not satisfied with the facts, you should clearly communicate that.

Can You Still Contest After Signing the Blue Ticket?

Even if you have signed the blue ticket, it does not mean you are absolutely unable to contest it under the law.

However, your signature may be treated as having received an explanation from the police officer and confirmed certain facts of the violation.

Therefore, even if you later claim:

• "Actually, I was not satisfied with the violation,"
• "I thought it was not a violation because the light suddenly burned out while driving,"

it may become difficult to make your case.

If you are not satisfied with the facts of the violation, it is important not to sign hastily on the spot and to organize which points you disagree with.

That said, it can be difficult to make a calm judgment during an exchange with a police officer.

Before reaching a conclusion on the spot, carefully confirm the contents of the documents, the violation name, the fine amount, and the subsequent procedures.

Should You Pay the Traffic Fine or Contest It?

Whether you should pay the traffic fine or contest it depends on the case.

The advantage of paying the traffic fine is that you can conclude the matter quickly.

If you want to minimize the impact on your work and daily life, it can be a practical option.

On the other hand, if you pay the traffic fine without being satisfied, while the matter will not proceed to criminal proceedings for that violation, the issue of penalty points remains.

In particular,

• You have accumulated penalty points
• You are close to a license suspension
• You need to drive for work
• Your profession is affected by a violation record

For people in these situations, even one point can have a significant impact.

If you choose to contest, you need to consider:

• Whether the brake light was actually out
• When it burned out
• Whether a pre-departure inspection was performed
• Whether the malfunction could have been detected
• Whether there were any issues with the police officer's verification method
• Whether there is evidence

These points need to be examined.

However, contesting a traffic violation involves time and procedural burdens.

It is important not to contest solely based on the feeling of "I cannot accept this," but to make a judgment based on the evidence and the outlook.

Daily Inspections to Prevent Burned-Out Brake Lights

To prevent trouble caused by burned-out brake lights, daily inspections are important.

Since brake lights are difficult to check directly from the driver's seat, the following methods are recommended:

• Have a family member or passenger check from behind the vehicle
• Check the reflection against a wall or glass surface
• Check the lighting status at night or in dimly lit areas
• Have the lights checked during vehicle inspections or periodic maintenance
• Have the vehicle inspected promptly if a warning light comes on
• Consider preventive bulb replacement for older vehicles

Also, if you receive a verbal warning from a police officer, make sure to have the repair done as soon as possible.

If you continue to drive without repairing the issue after being warned once, the next time you are stopped, it is more likely to be processed as a violation.

Burned-Out Brake Lights Are Also Important in Relation to Traffic Accidents

A burned-out brake light can affect not only traffic violations but also the allocation of fault in traffic accidents.

For example, even in a rear-end collision where your vehicle was hit from behind, if the front vehicle's brake light was out,

it may be argued, and depending on the nature of the accident, the fault of the front vehicle may become an issue.

Of course, in rear-end collisions, the following vehicle generally bears greater responsibility.

However, if the fact that the brake light was not functioning properly can be said to have contributed to the occurrence of the accident or the extent of the damage, it may become a point of contention in the allocation of fault.

In this sense as well, keeping brake lights and other lighting equipment in proper working condition is important not only to avoid traffic violations but also to avoid disadvantages in the event of an accident.

Cases Where You Should Consult a Lawyer

A vehicle maintenance deficiency violation due to a burned-out brake light is often treated as a relatively minor traffic violation.

Therefore, it is not necessary to retain a lawyer in every case.

However, you may want to consider consulting a lawyer in the following situations:

• You are not satisfied with the facts of the violation
• You want to explain that the light was working during the morning inspection
• You have concerns about signing the blue ticket or paying the traffic fine
• You face the risk of license suspension due to accumulated penalty points
• You need a driver's license for your job
• You have been cited for a maintenance deficiency in connection with a traffic accident
• You have questions about the exchange with the police officer

Especially when the impact on license suspension or your job is significant, it is important to consider not only the fine amount but also the effect of penalty points and future administrative penalties.

Summary

Driving with one brake light out may result in being cited for a traffic violation as a vehicle maintenance deficiency (tail lights, etc.).

Even if the light was working during the morning inspection, if the brake light was out at the time the police officer stopped you, you were, in appearance, driving in a state of maintenance deficiency.

Therefore, it cannot be said that "you absolutely do not have to pay the fine just because the light suddenly burned out while driving."

That said, depending on the specific circumstances—such as having performed a pre-departure inspection, being unable to detect the malfunction, and having the repair done immediately after being notified—there may be room to contest the violation or argue that only a warning should have been given.

Payment of the traffic fine is voluntary, but failure to pay may result in criminal proceedings.

If you are not satisfied with the maintenance deficiency violation or are concerned about disadvantages such as license suspension, we recommend consulting a specialist as early as possible.

FAQ

The Initial Legal Consultation for Traffic Accidents at Yaizu Sogo Law Office Is Free of Charge

Yaizu Sogo Law Office provides a free initial legal consultation regarding traffic accidents.

We handle all traffic accident-related legal matters, regardless of severity or whether they involve property damage or personal injury. If you are feeling stressed by dealings with insurance companies, or if you want to know whether the amount offered by your insurance company is fair, please do not hesitate to consult with us.

Yaizu Sogo Law Office is available not only during regular weekday hours but also on weekday evenings and Saturdays. Please contact us by phone or email to schedule a legal consultation.

Are You Troubled by a Traffic Accident?

• Settlement Offers from Insurance Companies Are Almost Always Low
• The Insurance Company Said They Would Cut Off My Medical Expenses
• Dissatisfied with the Fault Ratio
• When and How to Consult a Lawyer About a Traffic Accident
• What Claims Can Be Made in a Personal Injury Accident?
• What Claims Can Be Made in a Property Damage Accident?
• What You Need to Know About Whiplash
• Traffic Accidents and Health Insurance
• Procedures and Steps to Follow After a Traffic Accident
• Fault Proportions Between a Through-Going Vehicle and a Right-Turning Vehicle at an Intersection
• Diminished Value (Loss of Market Value)
• Amount Claimable from the Other Party When Personal Injury Protection Insurance Was Used Prior to the Claim for Damages Against the Other Party
• Free legal consultation is available for traffic accidents
• Filing a Victim's Claim with Compulsory Automobile Liability Insurance (CALI)
• Lost Wages for Salaried Employees (Wage Earners) in Traffic Accidents
• Understanding a Company's Losses When Employees Are Killed or Injured in a Traffic Accident
• Finding the Court with Jurisdiction over Traffic Accident Lawsuits
• Want to Know Whether You Can Offset the Other Party's Damages Against Your Own in the Same Traffic Accident
• The at-fault party refuses to use their voluntary automobile insurance. What should I do?
• I was seriously injured in a traffic accident in June 2017, before the enforcement of the amended Civil Code (April 1, 2020). Three years have passed (but less than five years) since I completed my treatment. Is the statute of limitations still valid?
• How to Identify a Hit-and-Run Driver from a Vehicle License Plate Number
• Methods of Dispute Resolution in Traffic Accidents
• What You Need to Know About Medical Commuting Transportation Expenses
• How to Find the Insurance Company of the At-Fault Driver in a Traffic Accident
• Understanding Workers' Compensation Insurance in Traffic Accidents (Leave Compensation)
• How Much Is the Standard Compensation for a Traffic Accident?
• What Is Residual Disability Grade Certification in Traffic Accidents?
• How Much Compensation Can You Get for Whiplash from a Traffic Accident?
• Benefits of Hiring a Lawyer for Traffic Accidents
• Key Points When Dealing with Insurance Companies After a Traffic Accident
• How to Calculate Lost Income from a Traffic Accident
• The Relationship Between Number of Hospital Visits and Compensation for Pain and Suffering in Traffic Accidents (Key Considerations When Visit Frequency Is Low)
• What Is Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI) After a Traffic Accident?
• How to Use Lawyer Fee Special Coverage for Traffic Accidents?
• How to Handle a Traffic Accident When the At-Fault Driver Has No Insurance
• Damages in Bicycle Accidents
• Claiming Compensation When a Passenger Is Injured in a Traffic Accident
• Do You Have to Pay a Traffic Fine for a Burned-Out Brake Light?
• "I Said I Would Pay the Full Repair Cost" in a Bicycle Accident
• If Repair Costs Exceed Your Car's Market Value After a Traffic Accident, Can You Still Recover the Full Amount?
• Can a Car Proceed if a Pedestrian Yields at a Crosswalk?
• What Are "Replacement Incidental Costs" When a Vehicle Is Totaled in a Traffic Accident?
• What Damages Can Be Claimed When a Family Member Dies in a Traffic Accident?

See all articles on traffic accidents